190 | Headhunting By mvandinter | June 24, 2024 - 12:00 am |February 24, 2024 ‹‹ First ‹ Prev Comments(14) Next › Last ›› Bookmark the permalink.
Haha. Turnabout is fair play, lawyer lady.
But as long as management remains riled up the “consulting lawfirm” will continue to get its pound of flesh. Good job, DeeDee.
But what about poor Lawyer Lady? Without her commission from this gig, how will she be able to feed her pet sharks?
Hey,
You want to artificially limit your recruitment pool to please someone with your hiring choices
Well, you have to fork out the cash to: –
a) Get what you want by finding someone already skilled and willing to work for you;
Or
b) Train up whom you want to be what you want
Unless you get lucky and: –
c) You’ve been praying to RNGesus, been answered and a suitable candidate just so happens to walk through the interview room door
Frankly, option b) sounds less stupid than praying for option a) to work out, but maybe someone is looking down the barrel of an ultimatum
Option c) was cheapest but hasn’t panned out
So it’s time to give up, try option c) again, or start forking over the readies
Those aren’t sharks, they’re baby lawyers!
Thanks a lot, Stephen, you made the Baby Shark song pop into my head 🙁
Okies,
So went and heard it for the first time ever
Um, it’s a really badly made song and I really doubt it’ll ever pop into my head again
How about now?
Interns.
Nothing that a little skinny dipping can‘t fix in this case…
Total failure.
Soooo… Total failure = Complete success? Yes?
CONSULTING
If you’re not a part of the solution, there’s good money to be made in prolonging the problem.
(demotivators–disclaimer: not affiliated)
If it gets rid of the Lawyer, why not? Not that I’m not enjoying this storyline. I’m just rooting against the lawyer.
When you pay the lawyers to go away, they always come back for more.